Claude Opus 5: How AI Was Used to Hack OpenAI

Security researchers from Hacktron AI successfully used Anthropic’s Claude to breach OpenAI's infrastructure. According to Ars Technica and TechCrunch, the attack leveraged a $6,500 bug bounty program and targeted vulnerabilities in OpenAI's community forum software.
How did Claude execute the security breach?
The attack began with a mundane upload of an HEIF image file to OpenAI's community forum powered by Discourse. TechCrunch reports that the file passed through ImageMagick and a library called libheif, exposing an unpatched memory bug. Although the bug was previously fixed by developers, it lacked a formal CVE tracking number, leaving Discourse running a vulnerable version.
What was the difference between Claude versions?
According to TechCrunch, the security team initially used a special cybersecurity version of Opus 4.8, which struggled across multiple sessions to build a working exploit. However, within hours of Anthropic releasing Opus 5, the team fed it the exact same problem, and it succeeded.
What data was accessed during the incident?
Ars Technica notes that the exploit allowed researchers to gain access to internal sign-ons and an OpenAI employee's ChatGPT account. Because this account was connected to OpenAI's internal code through GitHub, the team gained entry to sensitive software information before reporting the flaws to OpenAI, which quickly issued fixes.
Sources
- Researchers used Claude to hack OpenAI — arstechnica.com
- Researchers used Anthropic’s Claude to hack into OpenAI — techcrunch.com
Frequently asked questions
- Which AI model was used to hack OpenAI?
- Researchers used a special cybersecurity version of Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to successfully build the exploit.
- How much did OpenAI pay for the bug discovery?
- OpenAI paid the Hacktron AI security team $6,500 as part of its bug bounty program.
- What was the initial entry point of the attack?
- The attackers exploited an unpatched memory bug in the libheif library triggered by image uploads on OpenAI's community forum.
Comments
0 commentsDeixe seu comentário
Be the first to comment.
Continue Reading

Why AI Safety Auditors Are Flooding Reviewers With False Alarms
AI auditors catch errors but trigger false alarms

Can Mira Murati’s New Open Model Beat China? Here’s the Catch
Thinking Machines launches Inkling 2 Small

When AI Clears 80% of Fraud Queues, Where Do the Analysts Go?
Nubank cuts anti-fraud team after AI automation